Mike Wallace’s essay, “Preserving
the Past: A History of Historical Preservation in the United States,” discusses
the history and struggle historical preservation faced in America. From the colonial era to the present,
Americans have had little incentive to preserve the past, instead favoring
profit over preservation. Early
forms of preservation were headed by private individuals and groups who would
buy up the historic buildings, urge laws to be passed for historic districts,
or used the doctrine of “adaptive reuse” to make use of historical building.
(189) Wallace makes note that the preservationists continue to struggle in
today’s world.
![]() |
| Courtesy of American Architecture. Independence Hall, Philadelphia |
Wallace’s “Preservation Revisited,”
focuses on how changes in America reshaped and drastically altered the success historical
preservation had seen in the 1980’s.
The changed in tax breaks that preservationists and those who preserved
historical buildings and sites and the “property rights” movement,
“dramatically reshaped the preservation landscape.” (224). The rest of the essay discusses the
changes to preservationist practices through three main ways. First was to pry open the definition of
historic, second called for the “economic revitalization of cities,” and third
was to align with groups that were fighting for the environment and the
preservation of endangered species and open spaces. (232)
Wallace goes in depth on his essays
on historical preservation and clearly explains how preservationists made
strides through the years even though they faced much controversy. His editorial in his essays clearly
voices his opinion on the matter of historical preservation. He also gives his opinion about what the
future may hold for historical preservationists and what mistakes he believed
they made in the past.
Antoinette J. Lee’s essay “Historic
Preservationists and Cultural Resources Managers: Preserving America’s Historic
Places,” discusses what historical preservationists and cultural resource
manager jobs entail. Cultural
research management is defined by the National Park Service as, “range of
activities aimed at understanding, preserving, and providing for the enjoyment
of cultural resources.” (130) A preservation historian not only does research
and documentation on a site, but must also be able to provide written descriptions
of physical evidence and “justify their evaluation of the historical
significance of a property in ways that can move the listener” to support the
properties preservation. (133) Lee also makes note of the issues that
historical preservationists face, the type of education many receive, and what
the future may hold for this profession.
This essay is very well written and very informative, giving the reader
an understanding of what a person going into this field can expect.
![]() |
| Courtesy of National Park Service. Historical Interpreters |
Mark Howell’s “Interpreters and
Museum Educators: Beyond the Blue Hairs,” essay discusses the job description
of a museum interpreter and educator and what it takes to become a great
one. A good museum interpreter
gets to know their visitors and decides what history to interpret depending on
their audience. The primary
function for those in this field, is to be able to show the “interrelationships
between objects, spaces, and the persons who once used them” and being able to
place them in historical context. (145) Howell also discusses how difficult it can
be to make a living as a historical interpreter as few museums can afford to
hire a full-time interpreter, instead hiring seasonal or relying on volunteers. Howell’s essay is very informative and
he makes it interesting in how he gives examples almost like he is trying to
dispel the belief that historical interpreters are all a bunch of “blue hairs.”
(154)
The web readings for this week were
really surprising. The content of
the letter Professor Cebula received from Patricia Pangloss was unexpected.
It is understandable that some of the history surrounding the house and
its residents would be excluded to fit what the visitors want to learn or hear
about. What was really
shocking was for Mrs. Pangloss to say that Professor Cebula should “stop
bringing into the 21st century all this negativism.” To teach all parts of American history
is not teaching people hate and negativism. This is our history, we should be proud of our history,
maybe not everything that occurred, but it is important that people are taught
our whole history and not just the good parts that people like.







